Sunday, July 16, 2006

WWHKD?

I've been tied up with family matters this week, so I haven't been paying as much attention to the world as I would like, but this stands out to me: The Middle East is descending into widespread war, and the U.S. Secretary of State spends her time today, what? Shuttle diplomacy through the region, trying to work out a settlement? Nope. Bringing together leaders from interested countries to work out some kind of coalition strategy? Nope. Making the rounds of the Sunday pundit shows to spin some kind of excuse for the situation? Bingo!

I'm no foreign-policy expert. But it's pretty clear to me that the U.S. has to be concerned about the developments in the region, has to know that its interests are in no way advanced by ongoing and enlarging conflict in the region, and has to work to try and resolve the issues. For better or worse, the U.S. is tied deeply into the region.

But it appears we have no plan. Nothing. So send the "top diplomat" out to sell the P.R. story.

Oh, wait, we had a plan: getting rid of Saddam Hussein in Iraq was going to stabilize the region and make sure this kind of thing didn't happen. And to my surprise, someone (George Stephanopoulos) actually asked Secretary Rice about that. Her response: it's "grotesque" to suggest we had any role in making things worse. Thanks for stepping up and taking responsibility for your policies. (Oh, and she managed to link 9/11 to this...Surprise!)

Almost makes one long for the days of Henry Kissinger or James Baker. Kissinger might have been an evil genius, but at least he had plans and acted on them, with at least plausible arguments that he was advancing the interests of the U.S. He spent a fair amount of time on TV, advocating his positions, too. But at least he had something to defend. Ms. Rice has nothing.

3 comments:

sarette said...

Well, at least she wasn't off shopping for shoes.

Kelly A. Harrison said...

Well, I've been thinking that this conflict could be the way the US gets into Iran. The NYTimes had an article saying that Iran supplied the drones that attacked the Israeli ship. Somehow I think this is just a ploy--Bush seems to be trigger happy WRT Iran. I can just see him saying the US has to "save Israel from the terrorists" and somehow rope us into it.

It's interesting how, after reading several blogs and articles, people on both sides of the political spectrum see this as a likely precursor to WWIII. Scary.

Chard said...

Of course, Newt Gingrich says we're already IN WW3. Terrific. This guy wants to be president, and he's as wacked as they come.